STORING,
- Corrugated packing collects moisture, which makes the load unstable and, therefore, unfit for top-on-top storage.
- Film wrapping gives optimum stacking possibilities; up to eight layers is possible and also protects the pallet loads from dust and moisture.
- Film wrapping stabilises pallet loads and prevents split deliveries. In addition, it also protects the contents of the pallet from weather and dust in transit.
COST,
This link illustrates the cost comparison between film wrapping and corrugated packaging. http://aquatechnology.net/shrinkcomparison.html
The company is aqua technology company that requires packing of bottles to be done. The comparison is done based on the cost of packing 1,500,000 bottles per year. It shows that the cost of film wrapping is cheaper than that of corrugated packaging. Therefore it is fair to say that in general film wrapping is a cheaper alternative as compared to corrugated packaging.
FLEXIBILITY,
- A shrink-wrapping system combines high quality modular construction with state-of-the-art process control.
- Quick and easy change over and lack of change parts make it ideal for those companies who run production lines that are not dedicated or where regular pack and size changes take place.
- Providing complete flexibility and ease of operation, the system can be expanded or simplified on the user's premises.
This means that the customer can upgrade their machine at any time in a simple, practical and cost effective way, whilst at the same time future-proofing their initial capital investment.
RSS Feed (xml)

















Automatic Pallet Stretch Wrapping Turntable Machines
























